Just how does one get a still
picture to move? And who figured out how to do it?
If I could go back in time and ask these
questions, we’d hear an international chorus of me, me, moi, moi, as Englishman
Eadweard Muybridge, American Thomas Edison, and Frenchmen, Louis LePrince and
Louis Lumiere all raise their hands frantically. And they do all own a piece of the answer,
for no single inventor could have done
it without looking at the ideas of the others.
In this and the next post we’ll confine our discussion to Muybridge and
Edison, for it is their inventions that are in direct line with what we call
the video camera today. It is also amusing to note that judging from the lives
they lived, neither one of these pioneers of moving images was able to sit
still for long.
Before we start though, let’s
keep in mind that a movie camera is nothing more than a camera that captures
many images in sequence and records them on media. What sets the images in
motion?
Your brain; we are only able to process
individual frames if presented at a
maximum of 12 per second. Our brains hold these images for about 1/15 of a
second. So if frames are presented at 15
per second or faster, we will perceive them as continuous motion. Early movies,
or moving pictures, as they were rightly called had a frame rate of 14 to 24
images per second.
Keeping that
basic concept in mind, let’s see what Muybridge did with it.
Eadweard Muybridge
British
expatriate Eadweard Muybrige might never have been inspired to explore the
moving image had not Leland Stanford ,governor
of California, businessman, and horse-owner been set on winning an argument.
Does a horse, at any time, while
trotting, lift all four feet off the ground?
Stanford was
on the yay side. In fact he was so entrenched that he hired Muybridge to prove
him right. Famous for his large photographs of Yosemite Valley, Muybridge was a
brilliant but eccentric photographer. And true to his nature, his new project
followed a circuitous route to its completion.
Initially hired in 1872, Muybridge’s first attempts failed due to the
lack of a fast enough shutter on his camera. His second attempt was delayed by
six years; a period in which he was acquitted of murdering his wife’s lover.
After such a
close brush with being confined to one space, he spent the next few years traveling though Mexico and South America. He supported himself with publicity
photos taken for Union Pacific Railroad, owned by none other than Leland
Stanford.
Upon his
return to California Muybridge resumed his horse-in-action quest, working with
a set-up of anywhere from 12 to 24 cameras, each equipped with a special
shutter he designed to give an exposure of 2/1000 of a second. When lined up in
sequence, it did appear that there were frames that captured all four feet drawn up under the horse. Line
drawings of his images soon circulated among the horsey set.
However with
the publicity, came skepticism. Doubters
pointed to the leg positions in several of the frames and claimed they were
anatomically impossible. Never one to back down from proving his point,
Muybridge invented a device called a zoopraxiscope and took to the road for a
series of lectures.
The
zoopraxiscope was a lantern-like device that centered around a glass disc upon
which he printed his photographs.
When
the disc was rotated, the images were projected to the screen in rapid
succession, giving viewers the illusion of motion.
Some claim the zoopraxiscope
was the precursor of modern cinema.
Muybridge
next devoted his efforts to showing humans in motion. His studies resulted in
over 100,000 images capturing progressive movements within fractions of a
second.
A question occurred to him : What if I could
add sound?
Upon hearing of the new sound producing phonograph Thomas Edison had
invented, Muybridge and the zoopraxiscope traveled to New Jersey with just this
proposition for Mr. Edison.
Our next post will delve into what Mr Edison thought. Meanwhile if you are looking to purchase an IP camera or IP camera system or need information about one, please visit www.kintronics.com
No comments:
Post a Comment